Dr. Ron Paul did an interview late November on Anti War Radio in which he stated that under the rule of a Paul presidency, US citizens would be able to participate in foreign wars (as long as they do it as an individual and not force money or help from other). In the 9 minute interview, Dr. Paul's description of the policy stance our country would have on war is mind boggling. I do believe that he would end our standing armies policy, but he would actually just replace it with some sort of immunity to US citizens that allows them to kill and come home scottfree of any laws they violated that aren't US laws. Do you think this would end US military interventions or competent privatize them? And how would that make war look- the same or different?
Tags: Paul, Ron, candidate, election, empire, libertarian, politics, president, war, warfare
-
▶ Reply to This