Ever wonder how a person is defined as being Black or an African American in the United States? It all goes back to something called “The One Drop Rule.” This definition was socially constructed by racists in the South, and has become the nation's definition with the backing of state and federal courts.
The Rule says that any person with any known African Black Ancestry (even one drop of "Black blood") is Black, including those who look white and are descended mostly from European, Asian, Hispanic, or Native American ancestors. (Even though our ethnicity comes from our genes, not our blood.) It is also known as the "One Black Ancestor Rule," and some courts have called it the "Traceable Amount Rule." Enforcement of this Rule during three and one-half centuries of miscegenation has produced an ethnic community defined as Black or African American that ranges in color and other physical traits from persons who look sub-Sahara African to others who look white or Native American.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE RULE
The One-Drop Rule arose to keep the mixed children of slaves in slavery! For a time there was a competing Rule in South Carolina and Louisiana which defined mulattos as an in-between class of "Coloreds" rather than as Blacks. This latter concept gave way to the One-Drop Rule in the 1850s in order to preserve slavery. After the emancipation, the One-Drop Rule helped to maintain racial segregation, white political domination, and the sexual exploitation of Black women. The Civil War, Jim Crow segregation, the Harlem Renaissance, and the Civil Rights Movement all strengthened the Rule. Blacks in general now strongly support the One-Drop Rule in order to preserve unity among all Americans defined as Blacks.
UNIQUENESS OF THE RULE
The One-Drop Rule is unique in two ways:
No other racial minority in the United States is subject to a One-Drop Rule. A person whose ancestry is one-fourth or less Chinese or Native American, for example, may be assimilated just as European immigrants have been, and still be proud of the minority ancestry. The concept of "passing as white," which reflects the One-Drop Rule, applies only to persons with some sub-Saharan African ancestry.
No other nation has a One-Drop Rule. Ethnically mixed persons elsewhere in the world have varying statuses, but all are in some sense considered mixed rather than being forced into a single racial category. A great many people not defined as Black in their native countries are defined as Blacks in the United States. People-of-color would be a more correct and acceptable label, if one is even necessary.
EXCEPTIONS, PROBLEMS, AND CURRENT CHALLENGES
Exceptions to the Rule exist for some Hispanics, some persons with Native American ancestry, the traditional Black Creoles, and some of the light Blacks adopted by whites. Such problems as dilemmas of racial identity, anxieties about "hidden Blackness," traumatic experiences of light Blacks, and conflicts over color differences and hair texture in the Black community are not new. However, public discussion of such problems has increased in recent years.
The movement to allow mixed children to identify themselves as "multi-racial," rather than as Black, highlights the administrative problems faced by the US Bureau of the Census and officials in Health, Education, Welfare, and adoption agancies as they attempt to cope with the One-Drop Rule in this “Race-Based Society.” As “multi-racial,” “multi-ethnic,” or “Mixed” become more acceptable concepts, this will cause increased problems for Blacks or African Americans who are ethnocentric or Afro-Centric who fear a diminished concern of race or ethnic consciousness and racial solidarity.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by lamont debro on January 11, 2011 at 7:59am
Permalink Reply by AllPeople (AP) Gifts on November 30, 2011 at 9:11pm .
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
The following corrections
are needed on this article:
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
A) The racist ‘One-Drop-Rule’ (ODR) was
NOT used in the United States (U.S.) with the
purpose of making people into chattel-slaves
nor was it ever used “to preserve slavery”.
.
The racist ‘One-Drop Rule’ (ODR) was used
to falsely force the Mixed-Race people
who were of ‘any’ part-Black lineage into
the racial-categorization of “black”.
.
The misogynistic ‘Rule-Of-Matriliny’ (ROM) is what was
implemented (on the antebellum-era, continental United
States) to automatically classify people as chattel-slaves.
.
The misogynistic ‘Rule-Of-Matriliny’ (ROM) stated that
if a person’s ‘mother’ was categorized as “chattel”
(property) then that person was also “chattel”.
.
Due to the ROM, the chattel-slavery System on the
antebellum-era, continental U.S was NOT (as most
people mistakenly think) “color”-based (i.e. racial)
-- but rather – it was “mother”-based (i.e. matrilineal).
.
The ODR was also NOT used to (as the article falsely claims)
“ maintain the sexual exploitation of Black women” – but
rather – it was the ROM that led to enslaved woman of ALL
“races” (including ‘white’ – as there were some white-people
who were also chattel-slaves) being sexually-exploited and
assaulted – as well as the resulting offspring of these
assaults also being classified as ‘chattel’ (property).
.
The ROM was used during the antebellum-era
and the ODR was used largely afterward.
.
AND
.
B) It was the racist tradition of ‘Jim Crow’ (i.e. Legalized ‘Race-Based’
Segregation) – and NOT the racist ‘One-Drop Rule’ (ODR) that “helped
to maintain racial segregation” and/or white-power structured domination.
.
The racist ‘One-Drop Rule’ (ODR) was NEITHER supported, fought for
NOR strengthened by the American ‘Civil War’; ‘Harlem Renaissance’ OR
’Civil Rights Movement’ AND the MAJORITY of the black-categorized
people of the U.S. do NOT support the racist ‘One-Drop Rule’ (ODR).
.
ALSO
.
C) Contrary to popular misconception, the (ethnic) term of
'African-American' (AA) does NOT mean (racially) Black; the
two terms are NOT synonymous; do NOT refer to the same
people-groupings; and should NOT be used interchangeably.
.
The ‘African-American’ (AA) ETHNIC group
is comprised solely of the people who are:
"The ‘Descendants-Of-The-Survivors’ of the
chattel-slavery System that took place on the
antebellum-era, continental United States.”
.
The ‘Black American’ (BA) RACE group is comprised of
ALL racially Black-categorized citizens / residents of the
U.S. who are NOT members of the AA Ethnic group.
.
There are more than 18 million BAs found in
the U.S. alone AND only 13 million AAs even
found in existence (including expatriates).
.
D) The U.S. does NOT still have the racist ‘One-Drop
Rule’ (ODR) in effect in ANY state AND has NOT since
the 1967 Supreme Court decision in the ‘Loving’ case
(which led to the BANNING of the racist ODR).
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
Here are THE FACTS on
the racist 'One-Drop Rule' :
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
[** PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF THE FACT THAT :
.
The racist ‘one-drop’ “rule” was made ‘illegal’ in the U.S. in
1967 by the U.S. Supreme Court via the ‘Loving vs. VA’ case
(i.e. The ‘Loving’ case) – where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that:
.
--- 1) All ‘Anti-Miscegenation’ Laws found throughout the U.S.;
.
--- 2) The racist ‘VA Racial Integrity Act’ (upon which most
of the anti-miscegenation ‘laws’ were founded); and
.
--- 3) The ('black-lineage mocking' and exceedingly) racist
‘One-Drop Rule’ (upon which the ‘Act’ was based.)
.
… were all ‘UN-Constitutional’ (i.e. illegal, banned, etc.).
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
Here are THE FACTS
on Mixed-Race Linage:
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
1) It is often a surprise for people to learn that,
in reality, there is actually No Such Thing
As a “Light Skinned Black” person.
.
2) Very few people seem to be aware of the fact that the term
“Light Skinned Black” is really nothing more than a racist
oxymoron created by Racial Supremacists in an effort to
forcibly deny those Mixed-Race individuals, who are of
a Multi-Generational Multiracially-Mixed (MGM-Mixed)
lineage, the right to fully embrace and to also receive
public support in choosing to acknowledge the truth
regarding their full ancestral heritage and lineage.
.
3) The people who have been slapped with
the false label and oxymoronic misnomer
of “Light Skinned Black” person are simply
Mixed-Race individuals — who are from those
families which have been “of a CONTINUALLY
Mixed-Race Lineage THROUGHOUT all of their
multiple generations” (starting with the very
first generation of racial-admixing and
leading to their present generation.).
.
4) Seeing that every other Mixed-Race group is allowed
the dignity of receiving support in having itself referred to
by the term that it most prefers … the question becomes
…“Why should the situation be any different for
those Mixed-Race individuals who are of an
Multi-Generational Multiracially-Mixed
(MGM-Mixed) / Mixed-Race Lineage?”.
.
5) If an MGM-Mixed / Mixed-Race individual would like to
be referred to by the term ‘Mixed-Race’ (which is what they
actually are) rather than by that of “Light-Skinned Black“
(a term, which, once again, has the racist-origin of being
nothing more than an oxymoronic-phrase that was both
created and coined by Racial Supremacists in an effort to
try to deny these Mixed-Race people their right to and support in
publicly acknowledging and also embracing their FULL-Lineage)
there is no reason that they (like every other group on the planet
– whether Mixed-Race or not) should not be allowed the right
to choose the term that society uses in referring to them
(and to have their full-lineage acknowledged within that term).
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
RELATED LINKS:
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4162
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4160
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4157
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/3331
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1033
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1399
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/2511
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1402
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1003
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/3998
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4065
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/3999
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1400
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
Historical TRUTH VS. MYTH & Urban Legend
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
Listed below are links to data on the Historical MYTH
of a Color-Based / Slave-Role HIERARCHY — as well
as the Urban LEGEND of Paper-Bag, Blue-Vein and
Other Allegations of Features-Based Entry ‘TESTS’:
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4153
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4154
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/2885
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/2511
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1400
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
If there are any questions regarding the information
presented, please feel free to contact me directly at
the email address and/or visit the websites noted below.
.
Thank you and have a good day.
.
Sincerely,
.
– AllPeople (AP) G.i.f.t.s.
soaptalk@hotmail.com
Founder and Moderator of the following
online Lineage-Discussion Communities
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MGM-Mixed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FGM-Mixed
http://www.youtube.com/user/APGifts
http://www.facebook.com/allpeople.gifts
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
ADDITIONAL LINK:
.
http://www.facebook.com/notes/allpeople-gifts/the-facts-on-mixed-ra...
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
Permalink Reply by bishop omega on December 1, 2011 at 3:44pm http://smileyandwest.ning.com/forum/topics/nigerian-senate-approves...
lamont debro said:
very informative. i heard about things like this from big momma(great grandma) and the old heads when i was younger
Permalink Reply by Thisis My Fullname on December 5, 2011 at 3:06am What some people disparagingly refer to as the 'one-drop rule' is a matter of history. History is a lot like other, sometimes distasteful organic processes: it begins in one place, and ends somewhere else, independently of where you wanted it to. You can complain about how it clashes with your sensibilities; meanwhile, there's all of us.
Someday, somebody needs to acknowledge that, for the light-skinneded among us, there's as wide a spectrum of loyalty, love and identity for and with Blackness, and the people we got it from, as there is of skin color.
I never read Toure's last book, but I suspect it had something or other to do with this. Identity is irreducibly subjective in nature. That's not necessarily how it should be, but before the face of the only wise, just and merciful God, it's how it is.
Some of us are bastards, metaphorically as well as otherwise. I get it. Meanwhile, the less you feed the stereotypes, the less you feed them.
+ out.
Permalink Reply by Penguin Board of Directors on December 10, 2011 at 4:05pm Thank you to offie, AP G.i.f.t.s., and others who have contributed to this vital piece of historical fact mixed with some myth. It is all in the nature of oral history. Even some bits and pieces of written history were originally handed down orally.
Here is my real concern (and it does not in any way minimize others' valued inputs):
Whether charcoal dark-skinned, light-skinned, or green-skinned, could anyone here who has a bully pulpit rise up to be identified and articulate how many cases of whatever-skinned human beings victimized by the system he or she has offered moral or other support to secure restitution. It is not enough to scream into microphones or organize talk-shops, how many have felt the love we readily mouth while millions of compatriots are dying; not just literally but really dying? How many? Am waiting to hear.
Hiding behind the cloak of anonymity would not help as it tends to whittle down the potential momentum that could have been built from knowing that others care.
My quotable quote to conclude"
"When some care to care, they encourage others who may not have cared to care to also care."
Permalink Reply by AllPeople (AP) Gifts on December 16, 2011 at 6:31pm .
Listed below are links to information on the topic
of the history of 'Race'; 'Mixed-Race', 'Interracial
Marriages / Relationships'' etc. found in the U.S.:
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4162
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4160
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4157
.
http://www.facebook.com/allpeople.gifts/posts/309460495741441
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4152
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4153
.
http://www.facebook.com/allpeople.gifts/posts/272938769421484
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4180
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4179
.
http://www.facebook.com/notes/allpeople-gifts/the-facts-on-mixed-...
.
Permalink Reply by Thisis My Fullname on December 26, 2011 at 4:43am What, pardon my English, is all this B******* about "whatever-skinned human beings" (as if any of us is of any other, Thank You, species), and obsessing about Mixed this and Mixed that? Read your damn Bible. Civilizaton began with what we, THAT revisionistically, refer to as 'Miscegenation' as THE DEFAULT MODE.
GET OUT OF THE DAMN SANDBOX.
Permalink Reply by bishop omega on December 26, 2011 at 4:00pm YES, PLEASE READ YOUR BIBLE!!! INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE WAS/IS WRONG.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=joshua%2023:%2012-13&am...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Nehemiah%2013:%2023-26&...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy%207:%203&am...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus%2018&vers...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Peter%202:%2020&...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezra%2010:%2030&ver...
THE WAY IT WAS IN THE BEGINNING, SO IT SHALL BE IN THE END!!!
Thisis My Fullname said:
What, pardon my English, is all this B******* about "whatever-skinned human beings" (as if any of us is of any other, Thank You, species), and obsessing about Mixed this and Mixed that? Read your damn Bible. Civilizaton began with what we, THAT revisionistically, refer to as 'Miscegenation' as THE DEFAULT MODE.
GET OUT OF THE DAMN SANDBOX.
Permalink Reply by Thisis My Fullname on December 26, 2011 at 10:20pm First, sorry for the tone of my last one. Uncalled for. Meanwhile,
Ah. Let's talk about the Bible. It's Deuteronomy. The Jews have just left Egypt. In chapter 23, after proscriptions against any kind of fraternization with neighboring tribes in Canaan, the Jews are told that Egyptians can be considered fully assimilated after they've lived among the Jews for three generations.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+23:6-8&...
This isn't even necessarily after three generations of intermarriage; just of living among the Jews, with intermarriage or not. After which, what do you suppose happened?
Meanwhile, according to Genesis, both Mizraim and Cush were (as ethnicities) descended from Ham:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+10:5-7&vers...
'Mizraim' being an ancient Hebrew term for Egypt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mizraim
Now, you don't necessarily have to read Genesis with any literalist rigor to get the authorial intent. As of the composition of Genesis, Ancient Hebrews were emphatic about identifying Egyptians with Cushites, and Hamites generally. There's corroborating evidence from very different sources. For instance, around 1990, a team of expert British Egyptologists and forensic anthropologists examined the mummy of a 19th-dynasty priest. Here's a link to the book:
http://www.amazon.com/Mummys-Tale-Scientific-Investigation-Natsef-A...
And here, from another source, is a better picture of the reconstruction they did of his face:
http://tinypic.com/1040w7n.jpg
Meanwhile, in Numbers 12, one of several unsavory things that Aaron, Moses' brother, does is to complain about Moses' Ethiopian (/Cushite) wife. (A little further into the chapter, you can find out what God thought of that.)
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers+12:1-3&vers...
Now, it's interesting that Cush was in what is now the northern, 'Arab' Sudan, which has been waging de facto genocide on the southern, 'Black' part of the country. I have to conclude that issues of racial identity are merely a kind of laboratory for a broader hallmark of adulthood: the willingness to acknowledge that life is as compicated as it looks, and to live with the attendant ambiguities.
...Given which, Jesus is likely to be Blacker than I am. I for one am Just Fine with that. :<)
bishop omega said:
YES, PLEASE READ YOUR BIBLE!!! INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE WAS/IS WRONG.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=joshua%2023:%2012-13&am...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Nehemiah%2013:%2023-26&...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy%207:%203&am...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus%2018&vers...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Peter%202:%2020&...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezra%2010:%2030&ver...
THE WAY IT WAS IN THE BEGINNING, SO IT SHALL BE IN THE END!!!
Thisis My Fullname said:What, pardon my English, is all this B******* about "whatever-skinned human beings" (as if any of us is of any other, Thank You, species), and obsessing about Mixed this and Mixed that? Read your damn Bible. Civilizaton began with what we, THAT revisionistically, refer to as 'Miscegenation' as THE DEFAULT MODE.
GET OUT OF THE DAMN SANDBOX.
Permalink Reply by Thisis My Fullname on December 29, 2011 at 11:09pm ...By way of further context:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJhgmtM3tOo
bishop omega said:
YES, PLEASE READ YOUR BIBLE!!! INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE WAS/IS WRONG.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=joshua%2023:%2012-13&am...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Nehemiah%2013:%2023-26&...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy%207:%203&am...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus%2018&vers...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Peter%202:%2020&...
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezra%2010:%2030&ver...
THE WAY IT WAS IN THE BEGINNING, SO IT SHALL BE IN THE END!!!
Thisis My Fullname said:What, pardon my English, is all this B******* about "whatever-skinned human beings" (as if any of us is of any other, Thank You, species), and obsessing about Mixed this and Mixed that? Read your damn Bible. Civilizaton began with what we, THAT revisionistically, refer to as 'Miscegenation' as THE DEFAULT MODE.
GET OUT OF THE DAMN SANDBOX.
Permalink Reply by AllPeople (AP) Gifts on December 30, 2011 at 11:18am .
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
The following corrections
are needed on this article:
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
A) The racist ‘One-Drop-Rule’ (ODR) was
NOT used in the United States (U.S.) with the
purpose of making people into chattel-slaves
nor was it ever used “to preserve slavery”.
.
The racist ‘One-Drop Rule’ (ODR) was used
to falsely force the Mixed-Race people
who were of ‘any’ part-Black lineage into
the racial-categorization of “black”.
.
The misogynistic ‘Rule-Of-Matriliny’ (ROM) is what was
implemented (on the antebellum-era, continental United
States) to automatically classify people as chattel-slaves.
.
The misogynistic ‘Rule-Of-Matriliny’ (ROM) stated that
if a person’s ‘mother’ was categorized as “chattel”
(property) then that person was also “chattel”.
.
Due to the ROM, the chattel-slavery System on the
antebellum-era, continental U.S was NOT (as most
people mistakenly think) “color”-based (i.e. racial)
-- but rather – it was “mother”-based (i.e. matrilineal).
.
The ODR was also NOT used to (as the article falsely claims)
“ maintain the sexual exploitation of Black women” – but
rather – it was the ROM that led to enslaved woman of ALL
“races” (including ‘white’ – as there were some white-people
who were also chattel-slaves) being sexually-exploited and
assaulted – as well as the resulting offspring of these
assaults also being classified as ‘chattel’ (property).
.
The ROM was used during the antebellum-era
and the ODR was used largely afterward.
.
AND
.
B) It was the racist tradition of ‘Jim Crow’ (i.e. Legalized ‘Race-Based’
Segregation) – and NOT the racist ‘One-Drop Rule’ (ODR) that “helped
to maintain racial segregation” and/or white-power structured domination.
.
The racist ‘One-Drop Rule’ (ODR) was NEITHER supported, fought for
NOR strengthened by the American ‘Civil War’; ‘Harlem Renaissance’ OR
’Civil Rights Movement’ AND the MAJORITY of the black-categorized
people of the U.S. do NOT support the racist ‘One-Drop Rule’ (ODR).
.
ALSO
.
C) Contrary to popular misconception, the (ethnic) term of
'African-American' (AA) does NOT mean (racially) Black; the
two terms are NOT synonymous; do NOT refer to the same
people-groupings; and should NOT be used interchangeably.
.
The ‘African-American’ (AA) ETHNIC group
is comprised solely of the people who are:
"The ‘Descendants-Of-The-Survivors’ of the
chattel-slavery System that took place on the
antebellum-era, continental United States.”
.
The ‘Black American’ (BA) RACE group is comprised of
ALL racially Black-categorized citizens / residents of the
U.S. who are NOT members of the AA Ethnic group.
.
There are more than 18 million BAs found in
the U.S. alone AND only 13 million AAs even
found in existence (including expatriates).
.
D) The U.S. does NOT still have the racist ‘One-Drop
Rule’ (ODR) in effect in ANY state AND has NOT since
the 1967 Supreme Court decision in the ‘Loving’ case
(which led to the BANNING of the racist ODR).
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
Here are THE FACTS on
the racist 'One-Drop Rule' :
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
[** PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF THE FACT THAT :
.
The racist ‘one-drop’ “rule” was made ‘illegal’ in the U.S. in
1967 by the U.S. Supreme Court via the ‘Loving vs. VA’ case
(i.e. The ‘Loving’ case) – where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that:
.
--- 1) All ‘Anti-Miscegenation’ Laws found throughout the U.S.;
.
--- 2) The racist ‘VA Racial Integrity Act’ (upon which most
of the anti-miscegenation ‘laws’ were founded); and
.
--- 3) The ('black-lineage mocking' and exceedingly) racist
‘One-Drop Rule’ (upon which the ‘Act’ was based.)
.
… were all ‘UN-Constitutional’ (i.e. illegal, banned, etc.).
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
Here are THE FACTS
on Mixed-Race Linage:
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
1) It is often a surprise for people to learn that,
in reality, there is actually No Such Thing
As a “Light Skinned Black” person.
.
2) Very few people seem to be aware of the fact that the term
“Light Skinned Black” is really nothing more than a racist
oxymoron created by Racial Supremacists in an effort to
forcibly deny those Mixed-Race individuals, who are of
a Multi-Generational Multiracially-Mixed (MGM-Mixed)
lineage, the right to fully embrace and to also receive
public support in choosing to acknowledge the truth
regarding their full ancestral heritage and lineage.
.
3) The people who have been slapped with
the false label and oxymoronic misnomer
of “Light Skinned Black” person are simply
Mixed-Race individuals — who are from those
families which have been “of a CONTINUALLY
Mixed-Race Lineage THROUGHOUT all of their
multiple generations” (starting with the very
first generation of racial-admixing and
leading to their present generation.).
.
4) Seeing that every other Mixed-Race group is allowed
the dignity of receiving support in having itself referred to
by the term that it most prefers … the question becomes
…“Why should the situation be any different for
those Mixed-Race individuals who are of an
Multi-Generational Multiracially-Mixed
(MGM-Mixed) / Mixed-Race Lineage?”.
.
5) If an MGM-Mixed / Mixed-Race individual would like to
be referred to by the term ‘Mixed-Race’ (which is what they
actually are) rather than by that of “Light-Skinned Black“
(a term, which, once again, has the racist-origin of being
nothing more than an oxymoronic-phrase that was both
created and coined by Racial Supremacists in an effort to
try to deny these Mixed-Race people their right to and support in
publicly acknowledging and also embracing their FULL-Lineage)
there is no reason that they (like every other group on the planet
– whether Mixed-Race or not) should not be allowed the right
to choose the term that society uses in referring to them
(and to have their full-lineage acknowledged within that term).
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
RELATED LINKS:
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4162
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4160
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4157
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/3331
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1033
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1399
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/2511
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1402
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1003
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/3998
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4065
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/3999
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1400
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
Historical TRUTH VS. MYTH & Urban Legend
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
Listed below are links to data on the Historical MYTH
of a Color-Based / Slave-Role HIERARCHY — as well
as the Urban LEGEND of Paper-Bag, Blue-Vein and
Other Allegations of Features-Based Entry ‘TESTS’:
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4153
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4154
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/2885
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/2511
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1400
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
If there are any questions regarding the information
presented, please feel free to contact me directly at
the email address and/or visit the websites noted below.
.
Thank you and have a good day.
.
Sincerely,
.
– AllPeople (AP) G.i.f.t.s.
soaptalk@hotmail.com
Founder and Moderator of the following
online Lineage-Discussion Communities
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MGM-Mixed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FGM-Mixed
http://www.youtube.com/user/APGifts
http://www.facebook.com/allpeople.gifts
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
ADDITIONAL LINK:
.
http://www.facebook.com/notes/allpeople-gifts/the-facts-on-mixed-ra...
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
.
Here are a few 'Reference' Links for any
and everyone who refuses to accept vile
views of the racist-'One-Drop Rule' (ODR)
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4162
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4187
.
http://parablemania.ektopos.com/archives/2011/09/scotus1drop.html
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4160
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4157
.
http://www.facebook.com/allpeople.gifts/posts/300777016632181
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4186
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4152
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4153
.
RELATED LINKS:
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/3331
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1399
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1034
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1032
.
© 2013 Created by Smiley and West.
